The Alaska Supreme Court has handed Democrats a blatant vote-splitting scheme by restoring a namesake challenger to Sen. Dan Sullivan's ballot, overriding election officials who rightly blocked the obvious attempt at deception. This decision rewards a tactic designed to confuse Republican voters and hand the seat to the left, revealing how state courts increasingly tilt the field rather than enforce basic safeguards. Such interference distorts outcomes in ways that no honest electorate would tolerate. The Constitution vests sovereignty in the people through transparent elections, not judicial license for confusion that undermines informed consent. Limited government means restraining officials from enabling tricks that dilute the franchise, a principle the Founders embedded to prevent factions from gaming representation. Federalism leaves these matters to states, but only when courts respect original rules against fraud rather than inventing new paths to manipulate results. Voters will not long accept a system where names become weapons instead of clear choices.