Bipartisan senators clawing for new Russia sanctions expose Congress's habit of inflating its role in foreign policy at the expense of presidential authority. The reported deal with the Trump administration advances an updated package, yet leaves open whether the President will fully endorse legislation that ties his hands in dealing with Moscow. This matters because it risks turning sanctions into blunt instruments of legislative grandstanding rather than calibrated tools of national strength. The Constitution vests the executive with primary command over foreign affairs and treaty negotiations, not endless congressional directives that expand government power without clear strategic gain. Original understandings from the founding era rejected legislative micromanagement of diplomacy, recognizing that fragmented authority invites weakness against adversaries. Free markets suffer too when sanctions become vehicles for political theater instead of precise responses to threats. America needs a chief executive who leads without apology, not one hemmed in by bipartisan deals that dilute accountability.